The death of traditional media has been greatly exaggerated.
Of course we all knew that - along with the growing recognition that there is no "new media" or "traditional media," only "media."
The New York Times is reporting that a study from Yankelovich is showing those older forms of media, such as television, are still "much more likely" to make a positive impression with consumers than ads running in digital media.
According to the Times, the study covered 16 types of media, including billboards, newspapers, magazines, radio, television and movie theater commercials, along with digital forms such as social networking sites, video games, YouTube, banner ads and so on.
Among the findings:
• 56 percent of survey respondents said traditional media ads made a positive impression, in contrast to 31 percent who said that about digital media ads
• Thirteen percent reported a negative impression of traditional media ads versus 21 percent for digital media ads
• Thirty-two percent said they had neither a positive nor a negative impression of traditional media ads, in contrast to 48 percent who said they had neither a good or bad impression of digital media ads
Why is this? In the Times piece, some opine that digital media started off with advertising, and advertising came later. Others think it may be that we just haven't mastered the kind of advertising that will work best in digital media.
There's probably a little truth in both. But it may also have to do less with whether something's "analog" or "digital." So-called traditional media is a "lean back" experience where we're enjoying information and entertainment content, and advertising is now much more easy to avoid, or just as entertaining as the content.
Digital, on the other hand, tends to be a "lean forward" media, in which we are usually trying to do something - find something or accomplish a task. In such a scenario, advertising would obviously feel more intrusive and unwelcome.
As the two worlds converge, many if not all the distinctions will fall away - and have more to do with the "why" we're experience a media channel, not the "how."
For entirely different views from mine, read the Times piece, here.
Quick Links:
BRANDING UNBOUND The Blog
BRANDING UNBOUND The Book
ADWEEK Magazines Excerpt
Rick Mathieson.com